Prime form is useful for making pitch class sets easy to compare with other pitch class sets.
Prime form is also another way we can say that pitch class sets are related. Now we can say they are related by transposition, inversion, and/or same prime form.
Prime form is the way we classify types of PC sets.
Take (2,6,9) and align it to 0. (0,4,7) major triad. Invert (0,4,7) to (0,8,5) minor triad. Normal form for (0,8,5) is [5,8,0]. Take the normal form and realign it back to 0 (037).
What are our order options?
So our normal form is [3,4,8,t]. Take the normal form and set it on zero: [0,1,5,7]. NOW invert the original normal form.
And set the inversion’s normal form on zero [0,2,6,7]. NOW you compare the two normal forms on zero.
Our prime form is (0157).
Lots of concepts in pitch-class set theory are best viewed along a sliding scale of “concreteness” or “abstractness.” A concept like pitch, for example, is very concrete, while pitch class is somewhat more abstract. We can perform a pitch, but we can’t really perform a pitch class. We’ve seen similar examples in the intervallic realm. Ordered pitch intervals are associated with a very specific sound (e.g., +15); unordered pitch-class intervals (e.g., interval class 1) are less vivid or real. A basic concept in pitch-class set theory is that these levels of concreteness and abstractness encompass not only pitch and interval, but groups of pitch classes as well. These groups of pitch classes are called pitch-class sets.
We’ve already seen sets of pitch-classes, though we haven’t really been calling them that. When we extract a group of notes from a passage of music and put them in “[normal order][1],” that group of notes is a pitch-class set. As we’ve seen in class, one very interesting way of looking at a lot of post-tonal music is by studying the [transpositional][2] and [inversional][3] relationships between pitch-class sets. In the short example below (from Bartók’s “Subject and Reflection”) you’ll notice that the right hand of the two passages is T5-related, as is the left-hand. Within each passage, the right and left hands are T8I _and _T6I related, respectively.
In order for a pitch-class set to be transpositionally or inversionally related to some other pitch class set, they must share the same collection of intervals. This is most easily grasped by remembering that all major and minor triads have the same interval content (M3, m3, and P5). Major triads are transpositionally related to one another, while major and minor triads are inversionally related to one another. The same observation applies in Bartók’s “Subject and Reflection.” The four pitch-class sets in those two passages all have the same intervallic content and that’s why we can label transpositional and inversional relationships between them.
All pitch-class sets that are transpositionally and inversionally related belong to the same set class, and they are represented by the same prime form. We follow a simple process to put a pitch-class set in prime form:
The example below walks demonstrates using the motive from Bartók’s “Subject and Reflection.”
Analytically, the concept of set class is useful because it can show coherence in a composition. Bartók’s “[Subject and Reflection][1],” for example, uses the (02357) set class nearly exclusively—though it appears in many transpositions and inversions.
Theoretically, the concept is useful because it provides a prism through which we can begin to study the possibilities provided to us by the twelve pitch-class universe. For almost 500 years, composers mostly used only a small subset of those possibilities (triads, seventh chords, and so forth). Set class lists reveals all of the other possibilities. They also give us hints as to why tonal composers used only a small portion of them and suggest entire worlds organized through other means. Fortunately for us, we don’t need to create such a list because many others have! A particularly good list is found [here][2], and I’ll give you another to keep in class.
Most of these set-class lists are organized similarly. Set classes that have the same number of notes in them (we say that they have the same “cardinality”) are grouped together: trichords (three-note pitch-class sets) sit together, as do nonachords (nine-note pitch-class sets), and so on.
Prime form for each set class is show in parenthesis. The “Forte Number” (3-1, 9-1, etc.), often adjacent to the prime form, was given to each set class by the famous music theorist [Allen Forte][4], who was one of the first to describe the set class list.
The interval class vector next to each set class’s prime form is particularly valuable. Think of it as a numeric representation of the “intervallic flavor” of each set class. IC vectors have six places <_ _=""> that are placeholders for interval classes 1–6. If a set class has a single interval class 1, it will have the digit 1 in the interval class vectors first placeholder. The IC vector <001110>, for example describes a trichord with 1 interval class 3, 1 interval class 4, and 1 interval class 5; that is, the major or minor triad, set class (037)!