Please watch this wonderfully-made video on modal interchange – another name for mode mixture – created by Myles Yang for his Native Construct YouTube channel. In it, he demonstrates possible mode mixture beyond parallel major and minor modes. If you are not familiar with modes beyond major and minor (Ionian and Aeolian), please review Unit 2. You can also quiz yourself on modes at musictheoryfundamentals.com.
This video does a great job of explaining the concept of mode mixture, but as he mentioned near the end of the video, he is only “scratching the surface”. Having watched the video, you probably feel that you understand the extended concept of mode mixture, but if you were asked to compose a progression and melody the incorporated mode mixture, do you feel that you would be able to implement it? Where would you start? In short, this video explains the “what is it?”, but it does not begin to approach the “why it works?” or “how it works?”.
To begin exploring this, use the score below to try voicing one of the progressions taken from the video. Take risks, and break the “rules” as you try this. You must use the chord progression below, but you may alter the bass and soprano lines if you would like. You may also add as many or as few of the pitches as you need. Are you able to make this progression sound as pleasing as it does in the video? If not, what are the factors making this difficult? From a technical viewpoint, is it lack of knowledge or is it the medium (MIDI keyboard)? From a musical viewpoint, what aspects make the biggest improvement when you alter them?
Even though this is an entirely new style of progression, you can focus on the fundamentals of voice-leading to guide you. For example:
If you do these things, it is fairly easy to write a smooth soprano line and then work your way backward through the progression to create something such as this:
As you have hopefully come to realize, all tonal harmony – even the chromatic alterations – rely on voice-leading to create a sense of natural progression, and each harmony can be viewed through the lens of how it functions. From this, we derive primary harmonic functions such as tonic, dominant, and pre-dominant as well as embellishing functions such as passing, pedal, and cadential. Even the exceptions to these can be viewed as functional substitutions (e.g. deceptive progressions).
At its core, mode mixture borrows altered tones from parallel modes – thus altering chord qualities – but retains standard chord function. If a diatonic chord would have a pre-dominant function, altering an individual tone by a half-step will not alter the function. It creates color and often strengthens the voice-leading by changing whole-step resolutions into half-step resolutions. Moreover, if a chord functions as an embellishing chord such as a passing or pedal chord, then it will retain that function even if one or two pitches are borrowed from a parallel mode.
Even seemingly inexplicable choices can be explained – such as the iiø7 from the chord progression above – if you look at the voice-leading and compare it to standard diatonic function.
With this in mind, look at the following reduction of an excerpt from Mahler’s Symphony No. 2. How would you explain each of these borrowed chords? How do they function? Is this similar to the progression from above?
Each Beat 4 of the first four measures of this passage has a colorful chord that contrasts the stateliness of the C major triad of the first three beats. In measure 1, the B-natural against the B-flat is not a typo; this dissonance is intentional. If you listen to the right-hand of this reduction alone, you will hear a clear descending melody in which the borrowed B-flat begins the te - le - sol melodic tendency that we associate with melodic minor.
Underneath that B-flat, however, is B diminished triad, and when the B-flat moves downward to the A-flat, we hear a a clear borrowed viio7, which makes the B-flat an appogiatura. This figure is repeated down an octave in measure 4.
Measures 2 and 3 follow the same pattern of placing a non-chord tone on beat 4, followed by descending stepwise motion into a chord tone. In this case though, the resulting chord is a D-flat major triad. While we could consider this further mode mixture as a borrowed II chord from the Phrygian mode, it will be easier to wait until the next Unit to discuss Neapolitan chords.
Analyze the following two chord progressions. What factors help you decide how to label each chord? Which tones are chromatic passing tones, and which create new harmonies?
Chromatic passing tones often create harmonies that could be considered borrowed chords, but the determining factor should always be its function. If the resulting borrowed chord does not sound as a defined function (e.g. tonic, dominant, pedal, etc.), then the pitch should be classified as a passing tone. If the chord operates as a functional substitution (tonic, dominant, pre-dominant), then it is better to label it as a borrowed chord. If each member of the chord functions solely for smooth voice-leading purposes, then it should be labeled as a borrowed chord with an alternate function such as a passing or pedal chord.
In the example above, most will hear the first iteration as a I-IV-iv-I progression. The chromatic tone of the iv chord on beat 3 is present for the entirety of the beat and fits the harmonic rhythm of one chord per quarter note. Considering beats 2 and 3 as one chord would allow you to label the A-flat as a chromatic passing tone, but the A-flat is present long enough to make this difficult to hear as such. Conversely, the A-flat in the second measure is only present for an eighth note and occurs in a weak position. In this case, the A-flat is a clear chromatic passing tone and would not be labeled as a borrowed iv chord.