Please note: this is an archived version of the textbook. Visit IntMus for up to date content!

Lesson 1b - Labeling Pitches

Accidentals

This course assumes that you have a basic knowledge of how to raise and lower pitches in standard music notation. If you need to review proper usage of accidentals, please refer to the Further Reading section under Discussion 1b.

Enharmonic Equivalence and Pitch Classes

When studying tonal harmony, C-sharp and D-flat have unique functions and are not interchangeable, however, when considering their acoustic properties, there is no difference between these two pitches. At its core, enharmonic equivalence is an easy concept: When two pitches sound the same – meaning that they share identical wavelength frequencies – but have different note names (i.e. letters), we consider them to be enharmonically equivalent. All pitches that are enharmonic equivalents create a pitch class, meaning that there are twelve pitch classes in traditional Western tonality. Every pitch has multiple enharmonic equivalents, but some are used less frequently due to the necessity for uncommon accidentals such as double-sharps and double-flats. Note that all but one pitch class has at least three enharmonic equivalents when using the five most common accidentals: naturals, flats, sharps, double-flats, and double-sharps. (The remaining pitch class only has two possible enharmonic equivalents without creating accidentals that exist only in theory such as triple-sharps or triple-flats.)

Goals for this topic

Using the example below, determine:

  • three enharmonic equivalents for every pitch class
    • one pitch class only has two enharmonic equivalents if only using the five most common accidentals

Accidentals and Enharmonic Equivalence

Conclusion

Using the example above, you can extrapolate which pitch classes have three enharmonic equivalents and which have two. The first two examples given were:

A, B-double-flat, G-double-sharp B, C-flat, D-double-sharp

Each pitch in these groups belong to the same pitch class, because they share an identical frequency in their sound waves. Yet they function differently within the context of music, so we have multiple ways of labeling the same frequency.

The most important realization was that letter system employed in staff notation is the limiting factor in creating enharmonic equivalents within a pitch class. The pitch class that includes A-flat is isolated from its neighbors in such a way that there is no pitch that uses the letter F or B to create a third enharmonic equivalent if we limit ourselves to only the five common accidentals. The interaction between the 7 letter names and 12 pitch classes is the basis for our musical notation system and will be critical in how we label intervals, chords, and scales.

Labeling Octaves and Clef Relationships

ISO

When labeling pitches, we also need a way to refer to specific octaves or registers. We will be using the system used by the International Standard Organization (ISO). In this system, each pitch is given a numeral that designates its octave. For example, middle C is labeled as C4.

Goals for this topic

Using the example below, determine:

  • where C4 lies in each clef
  • what the numeral refers to in the ISO system for labeling octaves
  • how to describe the usage of this system to a non-musician

Conclusions

There are a few simple rules to label octaves using the ISO system.

  • Notes are labeled using a pitch name and a number.
  • The numbers represent an octave range and higher numbers equate to higher octaves.
  • Each numbered octave starts on C, not A.
    • Each number ends on B.
    • Even if two notes are enharmonically equivalent, they can have different octave designations. For example, C-flat4 and B3 are enharmonically equivalent, but because they straddle the octave break between C and B, they are labeled as belonging to different octaves.

You were given that that C4 is middle C, and from this, you should be able to determine where middle C is on each clef

From this, it is easy to see the necessity of clefs. Ledger lines are an important notation tool, but too many ledger lines becomes difficult to read quickly. Therefore, each clef highlights a specific range that can be written without employing ledger lines. Alto clef is typically thought of as a lower extension for treble clef; it adds the visual space of seven steps from treble clef. Tenor clef is a higher extension for bass clef and adds the visual space of five steps from bass clef. Of course, alto and tenor clef have similar ranges and one of the other could likely be eliminated with little issue – alto clef is visually seven steps from either treble or bass clef – but because both of these clefs have been widely used for more than a century, it is necessary for all musicians to be familiar with reading them.

Why is the ISO system based on C instead of A?

This is almost entirely related to the evolution of the musical notation system and how the non-accidental pitches (i.e. “white keys” of the keyboard) form a major scale. While this is a fascinating topic, it is somewhat beyond the purview of this chapter, but I hope you will explore this further on your own.