Before we move on to fully analyzing harmonic function, we must define the stylistic rules of the music we will be studying. If you remember from the Unit 6 readings discussing laws, rules, and strategies, rules are the practices that define a style. They are the binding agents that create a genre, but they also must be flexible enough for composers to carve out a unique voice within the style. The next two units of this textbook examine the rules established in earlier contrapuntal styles. Not because this is “superior” to any other style, but because these rules allow us to study how to weave independent voices into a single tonal piece of music. This acts as the foundation for most modern styles and is applicable to all tonal musics–even if the goal of the style is to break these rules.
To study these rules, we will focus on part-writing through simple four-part chorales, so in the context of these discussions:
Chorales provide two advantages for teaching harmony when compared to other styles of music:
As we progress through rules of early styles that might seem outdated, do not lose sight of the process that we are creating. If you understand why each decision is made in this style, you will be able to intuit the next leap forward. And as we add complexity, you will eventually be able to apply these principles to any style of tonal music, even those that do not employ the underpinnings of indpendent voices or diatonic harmonic progressions.
In the following example, each staff system highlights a different error.
To this point, everything that we have discussed has been based on a two-voice model, but to move into full diatonic harmony, we need to add inner voices and fully support the harmonies. When doing this, there are certain rules that create better voice-leading and part-writing when followed, but as with all stylistic guidelines, please note that these rules are generally strong suggestions rather than hard and fast rules. Good composers bend or break these rules if it better serves their ideas.
When voicing triads in four-part harmony, at least one note must be doubled.
Doubling in a seventh chord is similar, but because you have four notes for four voices, there is less freedom.
Spacing is straightfoward in this style, but it can be difficult to create consistent rules based on the limited examples above. Your final conclusions should be:
In general, an acceptable voicing will mimic the overtone series on which our harmony is created. This details of this concept are discussed in Unit 11, but a helpful guideline is to use wider intervals between lower voices and narrower intervals between high voices.
The ranges for each voice in the examples are conservative, but will serve us well in our beginning part-writing. These are highly dependent on the intended performers.
There was no easy way to notate this in the examples, but you should avoid crossing your voices unless used to create a desired texture. It is almost never necessary and often creates voice-leading and range issues. As you grow in your part-writing, you may find an occasional reason to cross voices, but do not unnecessarily complicate your first attempts.