Discussion 11b - Voice-leading for Root Position Triads and Seventh Chords

Class discussion

Circle-of-fifths triadic progression: I - vi - ii - V - I

• Static movement in the melody is very good. It’s exactly what we want because it can make everything else a whole lot easier. Priotize static or stepwise movement in the melody whenever you can
• Same progression, but with do mi fa sol mi (C E F G E) as the melody
  • Same process of building from the back. Since we’re dealing with a circle-of-fifths progression, we know exactly how tendency tones are going to resolve and we can reverse-engineer the inner voices after we’ve written our melody

Adding the seventh: I - vi7 - ii - V7 - I

• Used the same boring melody as before (C C D D C) because we have to K.I.S.S.
• Really the best way to do these is to write your melody from the front and fill in the inner voices from the back
• Frustrated leading tone: can ONLY be used in the inner voices. This happens when the leading tone resolves down by third to the fifth of the next chord instead of going upward to the root. Ex: in C, in our V the B in the tenor can go down to G on the next chord (I) if we really, really want to have a fifth in there

Short chord progressions, #2: I - IV - V - vi

• Soprano line: C C B C. There were a bunch of other options proposed that were at the same level of simplicity (focus on smooth voice leading), but they all caused errors
• DOUBLE! THAT! THIRD! for a deceptive cadence. vi is a functional substitute for I because of its position in a deceptive cadence. In this instance it functions as the tonic instead of its usual “pre-predominant.” We double the third because it’s do/the tonic
• Any time you use smooth contrary motion you’ll avoid the majority of movement errors
• “Circle of fifths progression” = literal circle of fifths bass movement. This is our vi - ii - V - I. When we move I - IV - V - (etc…) this is stepwise progression, so we can bend our tendency tone rules a little
  • Think about functional substitutes, too! IV is just a ii7 without the root. vii0 is just a V7 without a root. vi stands in for I in deceptive cadences. In the progression we did in class, temporarily changing IV to ii7 helped make clear why the A in our IV did not have to resolve how thirds usually do, since A is the fifth in ii7 and should follow the same voice leading rules
• vi6 is NO. The do in the bass makes it sounds like this chord was supposed to be I instead, which is the opposite of what you want to do with a deceptive cadence

Overall conclusions

• Frustrated leading tone is a get out of jail free card in the inner voices ONLY
• You can double the third for the vi in a deceptive cadence

Additional tips

• Check the outer voices for errors before filling in the inner voices. If you catch errors early, you save yourself time

Further reading

From Open Music Theory

Harmonic syntax

Harmonic syntax concerns the norms or principles according to which harmonies (chords) are placed into meaningful successions. These norms include progressions that are more or less common than others. Those norms generate expectations for listeners familiar with the style: if IV–V is more common than IV–VI, the appearance of a IV chord generates an expectation that the next chord is more likely to be V than it is to be VI.

In Western classical music, harmonies generally group into three harmonic functions — tonic (T), pre-dominant (P), and dominant (D) — and these functions group together chords that progress to and from other chords in similar ways. For example, since II and IV are both pre-dominant chords, they will participate in many of the same kinds of chord progressions, and at times can be substituted for each other with only a minimal change to the musical effect.

On a local level (chord-to-chord progressions), we can summarize the tendencies of these functions with the cycle T–P–D–T. That is, harmonies tend to progress through a cyclical progression of those three functions:

T → P → D → T → and so on . . .

That does not rule out T progressing to D, D progressing to P, etc. But it does mean that those progressions tend to be less common, at least in classical music.

Higher-level musical structures also impact the norms according to which these harmonic functions progress. For now, we will consider one higher-level structure that influences chord-progression tendencies — the phrase — and we will limit our study to isolated, complete, self-sufficient phrases. This is an idealized, oversimplified setting — like strict voice-leading — that is useful for learning the basics. Some such phrases even exist in real music! But most of the time there are a number of competing factors that influence the chord-progression strategies employed by a composer at any given moment. However, the idealized phrase is a helpful starting point. Future study will explore how classical composers employ harmonic progressions in larger musical works that combine multiple phrases (which are not self-sufficient) into larger themes and movements.

The idealized phrase

The idealized phrase (also called the phrase model) is a single musical phrase that progresses through an entire cycle of harmonic functions, beginning and ending on tonic. (Strict voice-leading exercises are such phrases.) These phrases begin with a point of stability (tonic), move away from that stable point, and then eventually lead to a point of high tension and resolution (an authentic cadence). This pattern of stability–instability–stability, or rest–motion–rest, with a single goal at the end, should be familiar both from species counterpoint and from strict keyboard-style voice-leading. (This pattern also governs large-scale formal structures in classical music.)

The simplest phrase that exhibits this complete harmonic cycle is a tonic-dominant-tonic progression: I–V–I. This phrase begins and ends with the most stable harmony (I), and includes an authentic cadence (V–I). The V is the high point of instability, containing the tendency tone (ti) that most strongly points to the final point of arrival (do, or tonic).

This harmonic cycle can be expanded by inserting a pre-dominant chord, a destabilized tonic chord, or both, as in the following examples:

I IV V I
I II V I
I VI V I
I VI II V I

In functional bass terms, any harmonic progression that follows the pattern

T1 → (P_) → D5 → T1

can serve as the basis for a complete idealized phrase. (Harmonies in parentheses are optional.)

Phrases are seldom 3–5 chords long, however, and a harmonic function can be expressed by more than a single chord. Thus we can understand the harmonic functions not simply as chords, but as zones of varying length in a phrase, which can be created by a number of chords or short chord progressions. More generally, then, our idealized musical phrase contains a single progression of functional zones T → (P) → D → T, begins with T1, and ends with an authentic cadence (D5–T1), as seen in the example below.

Triggering and prolonging harmonic functions in an idealized phrase

To establish, or trigger, a harmonic functional zone, composers tend to use a fixed scale degree in the bass. In other words, tonic tends to be triggered by T1 (always I), pre-dominant by S2 or S4 (including a variety of II and IV chords, in in root position or inversions, with and without sevenths), and dominant by D5 (V, with or without a seventh, or a compound cadence). These four categories of chords — T1, P2, P4, and D5 — are called functional chords (because they trigger the function) or cadential chords (because they can participate in a cadence).

Other chords are often called contrapuntal chords or embellishing chords, and are typically used to prolong a function throughout the zone.

Functional prolongations are shown in a harmonic analysis by writing/typing T, P, or D underneath the individual chord labels (Roman numerals or functional bass) and extending a line from the beginning of the functional zone to the end.

The following excerpt is from Mozart’s Piano Sonata in A Major, K. 331, I., mm. 1–4, with a harmonic reduction and analysis provided below the original score. Such an analysis is called an interpreted harmonic analysis, because the harmonies are interpreted according to the way they behave in the phrase, rather than merely labeled. In this phrase, note the following:

• The tonic zone is triggered by a root-position tonic triad (I or T1).
• Contrapuntal dominant chords (D7 — first-inversion dominant chords) create a passing bass motion between the opening I chord, the vi in m. 3, and the return of I in m. 4.
• The cadential progression begins in m. 4 with the move from I to ii⁶ (S4) and then to the cadential six-four and dominant triad (D5). Note that the entirety of the cadential progression in m. 4 is made up of cadential chords — chords with fixed scale degrees in the bass.
• In contrast, the entire tonic-prolongation zone is made up of contrapuntal chords — variable scale degrees in the bass — with the exception of the I chord that triggered the tonic function.
• The vi chord is a root-position chord, but still an embellishing chord, while the ii⁶ is an inverted chord, but still a functional/cadential chord. The difference is not the inversion, but the scale degree of the bass.

Not all classical phrases as neatly fit the general trends outlined in this resource. As discussed in Style and tendency, the principles of harmonic syntax are both reliable and bendable/breakable, and it is often the music that bends/breaks the “rules” in interesting ways that we care about the most. So in your own analyses, keep these principles in mind as general principles, and simultaneously look for where composers meet these expectations as well as where they break them.

Prolonging harmonic functions

The following are the primary techniques used to prolong functional zones in an idealized classical phrase. Examples of specific progressions and notational conventions are provided.

Change-of-figure prolongation

A change-of-figure prolongation occurs when the bass repeats (or is sustained, or drops an octave) while one or more of the upper voices change. The function remains the same (T/P/D), but the Roman numeral may change.

Examples include progressions like V–V⁷ (both D5) or IV–II⁶ (both P4).

Change-of-bass prolongation

A change-of-bass prolongation occurs when two chords of the same function appear back-to-back, but with different bass pitch classes. In some cases, these are changes of inversion: I–I⁶, for example. In other cases, the root changes: I–III or IV–II, for example. What makes these progressions prolongations is that the function remains the same. I–I⁶ prolongs tonic function (T1–T3), and IV–II prolongs pre-dominant function (P4–P2).

Contrapuntal prolongation – passing chord

Many change-of-bass prolongations involve a skip of a third in the bass, such as I–I⁶ (T1–T3). Just as in second-species counterpoint a melodic third from downbeat to downbeat invites the use of a weak-beat passing tone, a melodic third in the bass between these two chords invites the use of a passing chord.

The bass note of a passing chord will fill in the third with stepwise motion. The melody will also often contain passing motion.

A function is typically prolonged by contrapuntal chords belonging to the function that precedes it in the standard cycle. T is prolonged by D, D by P, and P by T.

A passing chord that prolongs the above T1–T3 progression would then be a dominant chord (D precedes T) with scale-degree 2 in the bass (the passing tone between scale degrees 1 and 3): D2.

Common D2 chords are V^6/4, V^4/3, and VII⁶. Thus, a I–I⁶ prolongation can involve those as passing chords. The following T1 D2 T3 progression uses a viiº6 to prolong tonic. Listen to this example, and then try to change the progression to a properly voiced I V^6/4 I⁶ progression.

Note that while scale-degree 2 in the bass can support a II chord, II is pre-dominant, and so it is not used as a passing chord to prolong tonic.

Contrapuntal prolongation – incomplete neighbor chord

In second-species counterpoint, variety could come by using a substitution in place of a passing tone. This leap of a fourth followed by step in the opposite direction still outlines a third from downbeat to downbeat, but offers a break from too much stepwise motion in the counterpoint.

In harmonic writing, the same effect is obtained by an incomplete neighbor chord. The bass follows the same incomplete-neighbor pattern as the second-species counterpoint, and the function of the contrapuntal chord is the same as its passing-chord counterpart. Thus instead of a passing motion of T1 D2 T3, a substitution pattern in the bass would produce T1 D4 T3. (In Roman numerals, that progression would almost invariably be I V^4/2 I⁶, as it is in the following example.)

Contrapuntal prolongation – complete neighbor chord

Just as a neighbor tone in second- or third-species counterpoint could be used to ornament a single tone and return to it, a neighbor chord uses a neighbor-tone motion in the bass to prolong a function and return to the original bass pitch. The function of a neighbor chord follows the same principle as the passing or incomplete neighbor chord. Following are some examples of neighbor-chord prolongations:

• T1 D7 T1
• T3 D4 T3
• P4 T3 P4
• D7 P6 D7

Here is a T1 D7 T1 neighbor prolongation in strict keyboard style. What is the Roman numeral and figured bass for the D7 chord? What is the least number of changes you can make to it in order to transform it into T3 D4 T3?

Just as third-species counterpoint has a double neighbor figure, harmonies can be prolonged by two chords using a double-neighbor figure in the bass. The most common double-neighbor prolongation is T1 D2 D7 T1 (commonly I V4/3 V6/5 I).

Contrapuntal prolongation - divider and embellishing chords

In second-species counterpoint, an interval subdivision divided a large leap between downbeats into two smaller leaps. Likewise, a divider chord takes a large leap between bass notes in a change-of-bass prolongation (or a simple octave leap in the bass) and divides it into two smaller leaps.

Divider chords almost always prolong tonic function, and can do so using either pre-dominant or dominant dividers. The most common divider-chord prolongations are:

• T1 D5 T1 (I V⁽⁷⁾ I), where the bass ascends or descends an octave between T1 chords.
• T1 P4 T1 (I IV I), where the bass ascends or descends an octave between T1 chords.
• T1 P6 T3 (I IV⁶ I⁶ or I IV⁶ III), dubbed the champagne progression by theorist Gene Biringer, because it is “the progression you pull out when you want to impress a date.”

Following is a champagne progression. Which version is it (I⁶ or III)? What one thing must change in order to form the other version? What default voice-leading rule is “broken” in this progression? (Note, because of rule conflicts, this progression will always break that rule, and it will always have these scale degrees in the melody.)

In the case of T1 D5 T1 and T1 P4 T1, the same harmonic progression can occur without the bass changing register. In other words, the bass leaps from do to sol or fa, but returns to the original bass note. Instead of dividing a large leap, the bass note of the intervening chord looks like an embellishing tone from third species. (In third-species counterpoint, an embellishing tone ornaments another tone by leaping to another consonance — usually a third or fourth away — and returning to the original tone.) Thus, what would otherwise be a divider chord is instead an embellishing chord.

Following is a T1 D5 T1 divider prolongation. What single change can make it an embellishing chord prolongation?

Subsidiary harmonic progressions

The last type of prolongation is not contrapuntal, but instead involves weak versions of the typical T–(P)–D–T progression. When such a progression fails to produce a proper cadence — that is, it ends with contrapuntal chords such as D7–T1 or D4–T3, or uses a “deceptive resolution” D5–T6 (V–VI) in place of the cadential D5–T1 — the progression is called a subsidiary harmonic progression (this term comes from Edward Aldwell & Carl Schachter; Steven Laitz calls the same progression an embedded phrase model). It is “subsidiary” (or “embedded”) because instead of occupying the whole phrase, it is subsidiary to (or embedded in) a larger progression.

These subsidiary progressions always prolong tonic. They are labeled in an analysis by following the initial T with a line:

T—————

For instance, consider the following possible harmonic progression for a phrase:

The first progression through the T–S–D–T cycle does not produce a cadence when it returns to T. However, it cannot be said to be a contrapuntal prolongation because it follows the normal functional cycle perfectly. Thus, it is a subsidiary progression.

Plagal progressions

As a rule, T is used for contrapuntal prolongation of P, P prolongs D, and D prolongs T. However, there are some common patterns in which P is used to prolong T.

The champagne progression (I–IV⁶–I⁶ or I–IV⁶–III) is one. Another is the P4 divider, as well as the related P4 embellishing chord. All are described above.

One other common pattern is to use IV (P) as a complete or incomplete neighbor to I⁶ (T). Common progressions include I IV I⁶ and I⁶ IV I⁶.

Also common is a change-of-figure prolongation of T1: I–IV^6/4–I. The IV^6/4 can be considered an P chord, but it is often more appropriate simply to consider the sixth and fourth above the bass in that chord to be neighbor tones to the fifth and third. Simply label such a progression T——— underneath the Roman numerals.

Prolonging a progression

Occasionally, a contrapuntal chord is used not to prolong a single function, but to connect chords of different functions — in other words, to prolong a progression.

The most common occurrence is when a bass line moves down by step from do to sol, which is especially common in minor. The bass line do–te–le–sol is harmonized by T1 D7 P6 D5 (usually i v⁶ iv⁶ V — the chord qualities are important in this progression, called the “lament”). In this progression, the P6 is a functional pre-dominant leading to the cadential D5. The D7 chord, then, is simply a passing chord that connects T1 with P6. To notate this, draw and arrow between T and P underneath the Roman numeral analysis.